Dear Women.
Also known as man haters.
Happy New Year.
Since substack are allowing me to post the truth on substack I thought I would create an “open letter to women” and put it on my personal site and link it on my substack.
As it happens I am repeating myself to many different women so I thought it would save me time to create at least one open letter, and perhaps some other blog posts on my personal web site, so I do not waste my time repeating myself to women.
Today is my birthday.
I turned 62 years of age today, the eleventh of January twenty twenty six.
I am world renowned as an honest man of honour and integrity.
Companies have awarded me million dollar deals based on my handshake and my word.
In the world of business, I am world renowned as a man who will deliver what he says he will deliver if the customer takes my advice.
In the world of business, I am world renowned for turning down deals when I did not personally believe that I could deliver what the customer wanted, including very large profit improvements.
In the nineties I resigned from three very well paying jobs because I was not willing to compromise my own personal ethics.
I am world renowned as a man of impeccable character.
The most compelling evidence of the respect in which I am held by those who know me is this.
In my family there was a tradition that the eldest grandson gave the “grand childrens eulogy” on the event of the death of a grand parent.
The role of the eldest grand son was to go and talk to every grand child and ask them what they would like have said on their behalf over the coffin of their beloved grand parent.
Obviously the “grand childrens eulogy” is the greatest possible honour bestowed on the eldest grand son as a birth right.
Just as obviously it is an incredibly serious and onerous task. In our family the oldest grand son usually only gave this speech once or twice in his life. It was rare that the same grand son was the oldest grand son for both sets of grand parents.
And in our family no grand son had been old enough to give the eulogy over his grand fathers funeral when he died.
In the event of the deaths of my two grand mothers the eldest grand son in each case asked their father to be relieved of this honour and task because they felt they were not up to the task and of doing it with the distinction that they felt it deserved.
In both cases the eldest grand son chose to give up their birth right of giving this eulogy and asked their father if their father would seek to have another grand son give the grand childrens eulogy.
In both cases the eldest son chose to hold a vote of the grand children and ask them who they wished to give the eulogy to their beloved grand mothers.
In both cases my peers, my cousins, voted for me to please give the grand childrens eulogy over the body of our beloved grand mothers at their final service.
I can not put in words how I felt each time I was asked.
These were obviously the two greatest honours of my lifetime.
There can be no greater honour bestowed on a man than to have his cousins, his peers, the men and women who grew up with him, to ask him to give their eulogy over the body of their beloved grand mother.
I went and interviewed every grand child and asked them what they wanted said.
These were very hard conversations to have.
Our grand mothers had been at the center of our lives our entire lives.
What words are sufficient to describe a grand childs love for his or her grand mother?
Those two speeches were the hardest speeches I ever wrote.
It was almost impossible to put into words the love of grand children for their grand mother.
In both cases the Good Lord gave me the wisdom and strength to deliver what I consider to be equally the best speeches of my life.
I could not improve either speech.
On the event of the death of my fathers mother more than one thousand people came to the church to pay their last respects.
Good men drove an hour each way to stand in the hot sun outside the church to show their last respects.
The largest church in our town seated about two hundred people and we had about two hundred more people standing.
And we had about six hundred people outside the church listening to the service.
The police had to block off the road and we had to hang loud speakers on ladders to broadcast the service.
Men in their seventies told me they had never seen a funeral service like it in their life.
As I left the church men in their seventies, and one or two perhaps even older, hugged me in tears and said words like thank you for your kind words about Annie.
I had never heard my grandmother called Annie before and I later asked my father who were these men who called my grand mother Annie?
He said that the only men allowed to call her Annie were the boys she knew as she was growing up and before she married.
He told me that once she married no one who did not already call her Annie was allowed to call her Annie.
She was to be called Anne or Mrs Nolan from the day of her marriage.
A story I never knew.
The old men where I come from were tough men.
It was very unusual for such men to shed a tear.
And yet many old men shed a tear that day over their life long beloved friend Annie.
Many old men had tears in their eyes as they thanked me for my Good Words about their beloved Annie.
When a man can stand up in his home town before an audience of one thousand men and women, a home town of just thirty five thousand people?
And he can deliver the grand childrens eulogy to a woman so beloved by so many people?
And men in their seventies, and even perhaps eighties, thank him for their kind words to their beloved Annie?
And for each and every grand child to come and say thank you for sharing their feelings at this very difficult time for them?
You know you are dealing with a man who is very well respected in his community.
My cousins would never have voted for me to give that speech if any of them had any reason that I should not give that speech.
For if they had a reason I should not give that speech my cousins would have seen it as disrespecting their beloved grand mother for me to speak over her body at her funeral.
Most of my male cousins would gladly kill any man who disrespected their beloved grand mothers.
Feelings ran very deep in our family about our grand mothers.
So before any of you women read anything else from this open letter?
You should know who is speaking to you.
A man of more than sixty years of age.
An honest man of honour and integrity.
A man of impeccable character.
A man chosen by his peers he grew up with to give the grand childrens eulogy over the bodies of both his beloved grandmothers on the event of their funerals.
Those of you women who have ever called me names?
You reveal your true nature when you call me names and lie about me.
My grand mothers and my mother are all passed now.
I am above the reproach of any living woman.
Now.
On to my open letter.
My former wife, Jennifer Marguerite Nolan nee Toal, was a terrible wife.
Few people knew this.
Those people who attended the Landmark Forum in Sydney Australia in February nineteen ninety five with Jennifer and I were told the truth as part of my efforts to have Jennifer behave like a civilized human being.
They were told this under non-disclosure agreements which I sincerely believe all of them honoured.
No one in my family knew of Jennifers absolutely disgraceful behaviour in our marriage as it is the husbands role to protect his wife even from her own stupidity and evil nature.
I had begged the women in my church to please help me with Jennifer but I did not disclose the underlying issues to them.
After I divorced Jennifer and then told my closest friends why if they inquired they were shocked to the core.
I was loyal to Jennifer until August two thousand and seven despite the final decision to divorce her being made by me in April two thousand and two.
I wished Jennifer no harm.
Just so you know.
In October two thousand and two Jennifer agreed to the following deal.
This deal was in order to get the two children involved Irish citizenship to give them a better chance in life.
As Australian citizens the two children, Joshua John Nolan, and Josephine Marguerite Nolan, had the opportunities in life commensurate with being Australian Citizens.
I had decided to divorce Jennifer in April and there was no possible way I would ever reconsider that decision.
In September two thousand and two I discovered that Australia had altered our citizenship legislation in the prior April and that Australians could now gain a foreign citizenship by residency.
Prior to April two thousand and two the only ways an Australian citizen could gain a foreign citizenship was by birth or marriage.
The opportunity to bestow on the two children an E U citizenship was a very big opportunity for them indeed.
They would carry that dual citizenship all their life and hand it down to any children they had.
Jennifer begged me and begged me to please be willing to tolerate her long enough to give the children dual citizenship.
Jennifer gave me her solemn word for the following deal.
I would give her two hundred and fifty thousand Australian dollars, that she did not earn, as her half of the house.
This was the equal of about ten years after tax salary from her final salary at I B M.
Two hundred and fifty thousand dollars, in cash, was a very generous offer and Jennifer knew it.
I also offered her work in our company and allocated her an hourly rate in line with standard rates for that work so that she could earn income from our company to pay for her own costs.
I, and I alone, would pay for all the daily living expenses of the children.
All Jennifer had to do was do about twenty hours work a week in our company and that would be enough for her allocated salary to cover her personal expenses of food and rent.
In case you do not know.
Jennifer was a high school dropout.
I put her through college and trained her as a programmer and finally got her a job at I B M as an entry level programmer.
Jennifer had more than enough training and experience to be useful in our company.
She could easily take on the programming and documentation writing role in our company.
By that time, October two thousand and two, I was working on the development of my next generation of software for my company.
Jennifer could have very easily worked on the development of this software from the comfort of her own home.
I told Jennifer that she needed to keep her skills up to date.
This was so that when I divorced her she could either continue to work in what would then become my company or she could get a good paying job at another company.
In two thousand and two the sort of work that Jennifer could do was worth about forty thousand euros per year in Ireland.
That is what the prevailing salary in Ireland was for people with her skills.
I told her that as a single woman she would be able to live comfortably on forty thousand euros per year.
I told her that if she would work hard and learn from me she could command a salary of one hundred thousand euros per year or a consulting rate of one thousand euros per day.
In two thousand and two even as the recession took hold I was still earning eight hundred euros per day.
I had been earning fifteen hundred euros per day prior to the onset of the recession.
In two thousand and six I was back to earning twelve hundred euros per day when I did a contract for Electronic Arts.
I told Jennifer in two thousand and two that if she wanted the children to get Irish Citizenship and she was co-operative?
Then I would be willing to train her in my consulting business and in four years time when I divorced her she would have the chance to earn as much as one thousand euros a day in my consulting business or in her own consulting business with my recommendation and backing.
I told her she would have the chance to get a job with a salary around one hundred thousand euros per year in Ireland in two thousand and six.
I told her that I still loved her and I would no longer accept her as my wife.
I told her I was prepared to train her and teach her so that she could increase her value in the marketplace either with my company or another company.
Jennifer accepted this offer but as soon as we had our new visas she stopped working in our company.
Her refrain was I am living on the money from my half of the house.
She kept up that refrain for the next five years.
Refusing to work in my company.
Refusing to learn the consulting skills I could teach her.
Indeed she took to taking eight overseas holidays per year and taking the children all over Europe.
When I pointed out that I was not prepared to pay for so many overseas holidays for the children because we did not have the money to do that her response was consistently I am paying for their privileges out of my half of the house.
So by August two thousand and seven Jennifer had spent almost all of the two hundred and fifty thousand Australian dollars I gave her as a line of credit in October two thousand and two.
In a discussion on this matter and her continued terrible behaviour in August two thousand and seven Jennifer said, and I quote.
When you divorce me I will take you for everything you have got.
I reminded her of her agreement of October two thousand and two.
She claimed that just because she had made a solemn promise and given me her word she did not have to live up to it because she did not write it down.
I reminded her that she had signed a mortgage contract with our bank in February nineteen ninety two that created an obligation for her to work to pay her fair share of the mortgage.
And in April nineteen ninety four she claimed that she was not bound by her signature on a contract because she had not said she would pay her fair share of the mortgage.
Especially since she had two children from her prior marriage.
I pointed out that now in two thousand and seven she was claiming that even though she admitted she had said she would accept the deal we made in October two thousand and two she was not obliged to live up to it because she had not also written it down.
Jennifer said yes.
She said that in order for her to feel obliged to live up to her word she must both say it and write it down.
Jennifer said that if she does only one of those two things she will not feel obliged to keep her word.
So I handed Jennifer a writing pad and a pen and I asked her to please write down on paper exactly what she said to me in October two thousand and two.
I asked her to please sign it and date it.
She threw the writing pad and pen back at me and said she was not going to write down what she had given her solemn word to as her agreement in October two thousand and two.
It is obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that if any person, man or woman, is not willing to write down on paper and sign a solemn promise they have given their word to that they intend to break that solemn promise.
So that night I put a keyboard logger onto our home computer so that when Jennifer logged into her email the next day I would be able to get her password and then I would be able to read her emails.
That was August two thousand and seven.
I also told Jennifer that given it was clear that she was going to break her solemn promise to me that when I returned to Germany on the Monday morning I would search out a divorce lawyer in Australia and I would organize to immediately divorce her no matter what the cost was.
She objected about the fact we did not yet have Irish citizenship and if I divorced her now then the children might not get Irish Citizenship.
I told her that perhaps she should have considered that before she threw the writing pad in my face.
I told her that perhaps she should have waited until after all members of the family had been granted their Irish citizenship before making it clear to me that she was going to break her solemn promise made in October two thousand and two.
Jennifer hung her head and said that I was right and perhaps it might have been a good idea to keep up her lies.
I pointed out to Jennifer that she had lied about me to the emergency operator at easter nineteen ninety seven.
I pointed out to her that she had begged me over and over again not to divorce her at that time.
I pointed out to her that the condition I placed on her so as to not divorce her was that she must never lie to me or about me ever again.
I pointed out that for the sake of the children I was willing to forgive her lie that almost got me killed.
I pointed out to her that in nineteen ninety seven I had made myself very clear that if she ever lied to me again I would immediately divorce her.
I pointed out to her that in our five year courtship I had told her many times that the two things that were not acceptable to me in a marriage were infidelity and lying.
Of course infidelity requires lying but a wife can lie about something without infidelity.
I pointed out to Jennifer that I had held myself to the same standard.
I pointed out to Jennifer that I had never lied to her ever in my life.
I pointed out to Jennifer that I had never committed adultery despite the many offers to do so.
Jennifer hung her head and asked me if there was any hope that now she had refused to write down what it was she had promised that I might believe her.
I said no.
I said I asked you politely to please write down what you made a solemn promise to in October two thousand and two.
You know from nineteen ninety seven that you are my wife under the condition that you never lie to me or about me a second time.
You have lied to me a second time.
You gave me your solemn word in October two thousand and two that you will accept the two hundred and fifty thousand dollars I offered you, that you did not earn, and that you will not attempt to steal money from me using the legal system in divorce.
That you refused to write that down when politely asked means you lied, again.
Lying for a third time is not going to change matters.
You know the saying as well as I do.
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
I said I am going to divorce you immediately Jennifer, and I am going to do that no matter the consequences on the children.
If you are concerned that the children may not get citizenship?
You should have thought about that before you told me you had lied to me a second time.
Lying to me a third time won’t fix lying to me a second time.
And so I did.
I immediately searched for and found a lawyer in Sydney and I asked them to please work with me to go through the process of divorce in Australia.
It was because I was reading Jennifers email each day from that day forward that I knew that on that Monday morning, after the children had left the house for school, she went to the bank and stole eighteen thousand euros from our company account.
That was how I found out that she had been in contact with the feminist lawyer Fiona Brassil in Dublin since March.
Jennifer had been emailing Fiona Brassil since March and talking about what she could expect to get from me under Irish Legislation once she was an Irish Citizen.
Even so.
In November two thousand and seven I asked for a family meeting in what was formerly the family home.
That family meeting was conducted on Saturday the tenth of November two thousand and seven.
Present at the family meeting were Jarrod Steven Robinson, Josephine Marguerite Nolan, Joshua John Nolan, Jennifer and myself.
At that meeting I offered both minor children the opportunity that I would give up my traveling for business and I would take up a job in Dublin to support them until they had left high school at the age of eighteen.
They were sixteen and fourteen at the time.
So I proposed I would stop my business travel for four years so that I would be home each night.
I said that the idea is that I will be home every night until your eighteenth birthdays with the odd exception that I might have to do an overnight trip here or there for meetings.
Given they were sixteen and fourteen they could easily take care of themselves for one night if absolutely necessary.
One of the neighbours could drop in on them and they could call a neighbour if they had a problem.
Josephine and Joshua were very keen on the proposal on having me home because both of them knew that their mother had been abusing them.
With both children in agreement I turned to Jennifer.
I offered Jennifer a further two hundred and fifty thousand dollars in cash, that she had no right to, in order to give her enough money for a new start in life.
In front of the children I told Jennifer that she can get an apartment nearby.
I told her that she will be welcome to come and go as she pleased.
I told her that I was willing to give her a key to the house as long as she respected the fact she has a key.
I told her that the children would be welcome to come and go to her apartment as they pleased.
I told her that she was welcome to give the children a key to her apartment.
I told her that the one condition was that the children are subject to my authority and my authority alone.
I told her that she would have no authority over the children because she had abused her authority.
I told Jennifer that I did not want any money from her for the children.
I told Jennifer that if she wanted a job in my company that I would give her a programming level job but that I was no longer willing to invest my time in her to train her to perform consulting level work.
I told her I was willing to train her up and freshen up her skills so that she could get her own job for a salary of around fifty thousand euros per year if she wanted that.
The children were overjoyed that I had made such generous offers.
Jarrod thanked me for being willing to give his mother a quarter of a million dollars she did not earn.
He told her mother that I had done so much for him and Kristen and that for her to walk away with a quarter of a million dollars was far more generous than she could have possibly hoped for given how badly she had treated me.
Jennifers father, Bill Toal, also thanked me for making such a generous offer.
At that meeting on the Saturday night I told all four of them that I would be going to the Irish Divorce Court Registry Office on Monday to check that Jennifer had not filed for divorce in Ireland.
Jennifer protested and said she had given me her word that she would not do that and she was angry that I did not believe her.
I told her in front of her children that she had lied to me two times as her husband and because of this her word was worth nothing to me.
I pointed out to her that her word was not worth anything to her children either.
I said to her that I felt very sorry for her that her own children knew that she was a liar and not to be trusted.
She was furious.
Jarrod stepped in and told his mother that when she lied to me she was also lying to them.
He told his mother that the reason that she can not be trusted is exactly because she is a liar and that she had to live with that for the rest of her life.
At that meeting Jennifer was not aware that I had been reading her emails to Fiona Brassil and that I had seen the discussion about whether or not to file for divorce in Ireland.
Of course, Fiona Brassil was telling Jennifer to file in Ireland before I filed for divorce in Australia.
Fiona Brassil was telling Jennifer the lie that if she filed in Ireland before I filed in Australia then the divorce would go through in Ireland.
Fiona Brassil was telling Jennifer that under Irish law the house in Sydney would be transferred to her name and the mortgage for the house would be transferred to me.
My lawyer was telling me that this had never happened and was never going to happen.
So Fiona Brassil was lying to Jennifer to get her fees and Jennifer was stupid enough to believe another womans lies.
I went to the registry office on the Monday and discovered that Jennifer had filed for divorce in Ireland on the Friday the nineth.
So when she sat at the table on Saturday the tenth and told her children to their faces that she would never file for divorce in Ireland and that the divorce would remain amicable and she would not try to steal from me she was lying to their faces.
So I sent phone messages to each of them and told them that Jennifer had filed for divorce in the Irish courts on the Friday.
I told them that I would be at the family home at four o’clock.
I told them that I would be telling them something that would be very important to them.
I told them I expected them to be there.
I told them that if they chose not to be there then they would regret that decision for the rest of their lives.
I walked into the house and sat down at the dinner table.
No niceties.
I told the children that Jennifer had filed for divorce in Ireland.
I told the children I consider this an act of war.
I told the children that this was an act of dis-respect.
I told the children that my offers of Saturday were now off the table, taken from them by their mother.
I told them that the new offer was this.
I would give Jennifer three hundred thousand dollars.
The extra fifty thousand dollars was the maximum child support that could be ordered in an Australian court for the six years of child support.
I told them that the extra fifty thousand dollars was conditional on paternity testing because since their mother was willing to be such a liar I now questioned whether they were even my children.
I told them I had reason to believe that Jennifer was cheating on me when they were conceived.
When I said that the children were shocked to the core.
I told the children that since their mother had committed an act of war they would have to make their own choice as to who they supported.
I told them they were not welcome in my life until such time as a paternity test proved paternity.
I then turned to Jarrod and said.
If you aid or abet your mother in any way in her acts of war against me then you will have a problem with me personally.
Do you understand me?
He said yes.
I then summarized the meeting with these words.
There is no question Jennifer is your mother.
I was there when each of you were born.
There is a question for both of you that I am your father.
I am going to leave now.
I am not going to talk to either of you until such time as you choose your sides.
As far as I am concerned you and your mother can take your three hundred thousand dollars and relocate to Wagga Wagga back where your mother came from.
Your mother can buy a nice house in Wagga Wagga for three hundred thousand dollars.
You can go to the same high school I went to.
If you relocate back to Wagga Wagga you will have the same chances in life I did.
The children asked me what about their citizenship.
I told them that was not my problem.
That was now their problem and their mothers problem.
I told them that from this point forward nothing to do with them was my problem until paternity was proven and they chose to be on my side in this now openly declared war.
I told them that Jennifer had committed an act of war and it was now their problem to choose sides.
I told them that my advice was that they talk with their mother and ensure that she withdraw her act of war against me.
I told them that if they allowed their mother to commit acts of war against me they had chosen their side and I would consider them my enemies for the rest of my life.
With that I got up and walked out of the house without saying good bye and without looking back.
Jarrod, as an adult, later allowed his bank account to be used as a mechanism to send money to Jennifers Lawyer Fiona Brassil.
I considered this an act of war on Jarrods behalf.
I confronted him on this in February two thousand and eight at the dinner table in my fathers home.
Jarrod was shocked I knew about his betrayal.
I asked him to his face if he recalled my warning at the dinner table in Dublin that if he aided or abetted his mother in any way against me I would consider that an act of war against me and that he would have a problem with me.
He said yes, he did remember that statement from me.
I told him to his face that he should now consider that he is at war with me.
I then took him out to the front garden of my fathers house where his motorbike was parked.
I told him I loved him and wished him the best in life and kissed him on the cheek.
He knew the kiss on the cheek was me disowning him and he started to cry.
He looked at me with a pleading look in his eyes as he was now crying heavily.
I was stone cold hard and said nothing.
He had known me since before his first birthday.
I had raised him as my own.
I had given him every chance in life.
I had even saved his life from cancer.
And now I was standing in front of him as still as a marble statue.
I was making it clear that he would never, ever, ever speak to me again.
And he simply broke down and cried.
He finally got on his motorbike and rode down the driveway and then down the street.
He knew he had been disowned.
I walked back into my fathers house and sat down at the table.
My father asked me why I kissed Jarrod on the cheek.
I told him he knew why as well as I did.
I said you know that means I disowned him.
I said Jarrod had better pray to the Good Lord he does not have a relapse of his cancer because I will not save his life a second time.
And with that my father and I changed the conversation.
I have included all that detail as background to who I am.
The man I am.
You can go and talk to any member of my family to confirm any of those things that I have said if you are willing to call me a liar and not take my word as my bond.
Unlike Jennifer?
Unlike all women.
I am not a liar.
So, having said all that and set the scene for this open letter?
In my case Jennifer attacked me in the Irish divorce courts.
I was issued this order on November twenty nine two thousand and seven
This court order was issued just twenty days after Jennifer filed for divorce in Ireland.
That means it was situation normal.
No special process had run to get this order issued.
It was for one hundred percent of my after tax salary I paid myself from my company.
That was six thousand euros per month which was about eight thousand dollars per month in two thousand and seven.
So in just twenty days the Irish divorce courts issued an order for one hundred percent of a mans after tax salary.
And all you women cheered and clapped like trained seals.
Hooray!
We can get a court to demand one hundred percent of a mans after tax salary as the default you women have screamed for eighteen years now.
You man haters never stopped to think what men might think of your joy and pleasure at the idea you can demand, with the threat of deadly force, one hundred percent of a mans salary that has taken him twenty five years of hard wokd to get to.
You man haters were quite happy to put your man hatred on full public display over this court order.
You can watch this video about this court order on the button below.
One of the many problems you women have is that I have a great deal of experience in legal contracts in the commercial world.
My job included working with lawyers on multi million dollar contracts with multi billion dollar companies and government departments.
I read this court order and inside ten seconds I knew it to be voluntary.
It says right on the court order that it is a civil bill.
Civil bills are voluntary.
Period.
It took less than five more seconds for me to realise that our governments are criminal cartels because I knew men were routinely jailed for not paying divorce court orders.
You can not be jailed for not paying a civil bill where you have not volunteered to pay it because it is not a crime to not pay for something you have not agreed to pay.
Immediately I realized why the in camera rule existed.
It was to make sure people like me with long term experience in legal contracts never saw a court order from a divorce court.
This is because any man who has extensive experience in business contracts knows what a civil bill is.
It also means that every person who has ever qualified as a lawyer and passed their bar exam is a criminal.
You can not get through law one oh one without learning what a civil bill is.
It is one of the most basic documents in the commercial legal system.
It is right up there with civil contracts as basic documents.
Indeed a civil bill is how a company presents it’s request for the payment of it’s services.
In later years these have become known as just Bills or more lately just invoices.
One wonders who normalized calling civil bills invoices and why did they normalize calling civil bills invoices?
I engaged a lawyer in Ireland called Pearce Neary.
I did not come on record until January two thousand and eight.
I asked Pearce to ask the judge in the situation what he proposed to do if I did not pay his court order.
The judge replied he proposed to issue extradition orders from Germany and to jail me in Ireland until I agreed to pay the court order.
So a week or so after this I told Pearce that I knew the court order was voluntary and explained how I knew.
He was shocked.
I briefed him on exactly what I wanted him to say in the first meeting with the judge and Fiona Brassil.
He followed his instructions because he wanted his fees.
Both the judge and Fiona Brassil admitted that they knew the court order was voluntary.
I also told Pearce to mention to the judge that I knew he had committed the crime of extortion.
He had demanded money with the credible threat of injury harm and loss.
This is because if a divorce court judge orders a man jailed the criminals in the police force will carry out that order from that criminal judge.
That judge and his family will pay dearly for his crime.
Fiona Brassil then asked me if I would give Jennifer money.
I said no.
I said Jennifer was my enemy and that a state of war existed between us.
I told Fiona that Jennifer and her allies will be treated as enemies in a declared state of war.
Fiona Brassil repeatedly bothered Pearce over and over again with requests for money for Jennifer.
In the end a conference call was arranged in October two thousand and eight.
On that conference call was another person who was a barrister whose name I do not recall.
My statement to Fiona Brassil was this.
“Fiona. I will get on a plane and come to Dublin and I will kill Jennifer and her two children before I will give them one cent.”
Fiona said you can’t do that.
I said.
“I can’t? I think you will find that I can.
If you keep this nonsense up I will and there is nothing you can do to stop me.”
You man haters like to talk about what men can and can’t do.
Here is a tip.
You man haters have zero ability to limit what a man CAN do.
Any man CAN kill a woman and her children with his own hands.
You rely on us to choose not to do that.
You are foolish if you think any man can NOT kill a woman and her children.
So you are well advised not to give a man a reason to kill a woman and her children.
In the end.
In my case.
You women stole my house.
You sold it.
You gave Jennifer ninety five percent of the proceeds of my house.
This is a rather obvious crime.
And yet you man haters clapped like trained seals when my house was stolen.
You man haters never stopped to consider how other men might view you clapping like trained seals when you stole a mans house, sold it off, and gave the wife ninety five percent of the proceeds of his twenty five years of labour.
You man haters just hurl disgusting comments like.
“It’s your fault you chose the wrong one”.
“You must have done something bad for Jennifer to hate you so much.”
“You are a dead beat father because you didn’t pay for your children.”
This is despite the fact no paternity was established and I have reason to believe the two children involved are not mine.
No.
You man haters just keep screaming your baseless lies as loudly as you can.
You man haters have been willing to put your man hatred on full public display right in front of young men and boys.
You man haters can not take back all the lies you have told.
The only weapons you man haters have left is lies and censorship.
And one day Elon will give me my X account back.
Then the only weapon you will have is lies.
I chose to prove the divorce courts were a criminal cartel.
So I video recorded my divorce court meeting.
You can watch my divorce court meeting on the button below.
The button below that is the transcript so that you can read the transcript as the video goes along.
You can then read the divorce court order that sent ninety five percent of my stolen house to Jennifer on the button below.
Interestingly.
Jennifers Lawyer in Australia was another criminal lying woman called Sarah Bevan. Sarah Bevan lied to Jennifer and told her that the house had a termite infestation and used that lie to justify selling the house for five hundred and fifty thousand dollars. This was less than the value of the block of land.
The house was purchased by one of Sarah Bevans allies. It was renovated and sold for more than a million dollars just five years later for over four hundred thousand dollars profit.
Sarah Bevan and her allies will be harshly punished for their crimes.
That I was given twenty thousand dollars from the proceeds of my twenty five years of labor after being married to Jennifer for eighteen years is a rather obvious crime.
A crime you can not hide from young men and boys as young as five.
And yet all you man haters clapped like trained seals that I was so criminally abused.
But you man haters were not finished yet.
Because I published that divorce court video, and the proof that the divorce courts were a criminal cartel, and proved our governments were a criminal cartel, you man haters attacked me all the more.
You man haters attacked me all the more because you wanted the free money that big daddy government was stealing from men to keep flowing your way.
That the divorce courts were proven to be a criminal cartel and that their court orders for alimony and child support were proven to be voluntary meant that your free money was at risk.
So you man haters attacked me.
And you demanded your beta brad soy boys attack me as well.
You man haters did things like publicly call me a paedophile, you published my photograph, you published my home address, and you publicly called for me to be murdered.
You man haters did things like make posts all over the internet lying about me so as to slander me to destroy my income earning ability.
You man haters attacked me from the very senior positions of political and governmental power.
Frances Fitzgerald as the Minister for Justice and Equality and deputy prime minister of Ireland refused to grant my Irish Citizenship or mandatory permanent residency because both come with a work permit.
Frances Fitzgerald as the Minister for Justice and Equality refused to dispense justice equally.
And all you man haters clapped like trained seals.
Theresa May, as both Home Secretary and later Prime Minister of the UK violated the Magna Carta which not even the Sovereign can do.
Julia Gillard, as Prime Minister of Australia, denied me welfare payments despite the fact I had paid taxes all my life and in my highest taxed year in Australia I earned two hundred and ten thousand dollars and paid ninety six thousand dollars in direct income taxes.
I also paid taxes on petrol and electricity and food and property taxes.
But all those taxes I paid were not enough for me to be paid an unemployment benefit when I was unemployed due to political persecution.
And worst of all?
Angela Merkel ordered four armed brownshirts to burst into my home, violently assault me, drag me out in cuffs, and throw me into Karlsruhe jail as a political prisoner.
She even put me in a jail cell with a man convicted of cold blooded, pre meditated murder.
I was even denied a change of clothes from my gym gear for nine days. I had to wash out my gym gear each night and sleep naked on my bed.
And when I say bed I mean a two inch thick piece of foam on a board that was intended to give me bed sores and deprive me of sleep.
Even then my self described Christian jailers did not like that I was not miserable enough and so they ordered the cleaning crew not to clean my cell and demanded I clean my own jail cell I shared with three other men each day.
And all this time you man haters clapped like trained seals at the crimes your fellow women were committing against me.
All this time you man haters put your pure, vile, disgusting hatred of men on full public display.
Next.
I went public in June 2008 on the relationships blog of the Sydney Morning Herald, the number one newspaper in Australia.
It was written and moderated by Samantha Brett.
I also commented on the blog of Sam deBrito which was called “All Men Are Bastards”.
Sam deBrito was very well known in Australia.
I asked both Sams for their help in saving mens lives.
Sam deBrito lied about me and slandered me and eventually blocked me from commenting on his blog late in two thousand and eight.
In two thousand and fifteen Sam de Brito committed suicide after five years of criminal abuse of the divorce courts.
I asked Sam de Brito to please help me save mens lives.
It turned out one of the mens lives he could have helped me save was his own.
His daughter is sixteen years old now.
When she is eighteen years old I am going to contact her and tell her what an evil man her father was.
If you want to know more about Sam de Brito?
This is the video series he released less than a year before his suicide.
You can watch him on the button below.
I told you man haters, on these two blogs, that if you did not cease and desist your attacks on us men you were not going to like the outcome.
We are now at the outcome in twenty twenty six.
I could write much more.
And perhaps I will update this open letter and date the updates.
But for today it is sufficient to say this.
I hate you women.
I despise you women.
I hold you women in contempt for what you have done.
I have made you women many offers including a fair and just remedy to the issue of marriage in my first free ebook I released in two thousand and ten.
You can read this proposal starting on page fifty two by pressing the button below.
You women rejected this proposal.
You women rejected the proposal that you be willing to serve on an all womens jury in an all womens court to fairly and justly judge women who are properly accused of a crime by a man.
You women demand us men put men in jail for raping women.
But you women will not put a woman in jail for a false rape allegation.
You women will not put a woman in jail for any crime.
All women support womens crimes against men.
All women are exactly the same.
There is no difference between Melania Trump and Hillary Clinton.
Last year, twenty twenty five I made you women the last offer I was ever going to make you.
The offer was as follows.
Option One.
You will unconditionally surrender to me to remove yourself from the war you are part of waging on all men and you will take a public vow of obedience to me. That vow would be made in your own name in the public.
Once you take a vow of obedience to me I will give you useful tasks to do without payment.
Option Two.
If you man haters refused to take option one then option two will be to suffer the consequences of not taking option one.
Given that you man haters have refused to take up any of my offers?
Given that you man haters have been committing crimes against me for more than fifty six years now?
Given that you man haters have been committing very serious crimes against me since November two thousand and seven?
Given that you man haters have been trying to get me murdered since two thousand and ten?
Given that you man haters have done everything in your power to incite your government and your beta brad soy boys to murder me?
As of January first twenty twenty six I have made the decision that I will put no more offers on the table for you women to reject.
The age of offers is over.
The age of total war against you man haters began on January first twenty twenty six.
My own personal goal is to introduce Islam and Sharia Law to Australia and Ireland.
In this war my allies are muslim men and those white western men who choose to join me as my ally.
White western men who do not choose to join me as my ally are welcome to stand aside.
The objective is simple.
The introduction of Islam as the state religion and Sharia Law as the state law in Ireland and Australia.
Men who live in other lands are advised, and welcome, to implement Islam and Sharia Law in their countries.
I will support them in those efforts.
When we implement Islam and Sharia Law we will rescind all the rights of you man haters that you have violated of us men over the last half a century and more.
What we will implement can be described as follows.
One.
A woman will not be allowed to speak in public.
Two.
A woman will not be allowed to sign a contract.
Three.
A woman will not be allowed to own property because property is owned via contracts.
Four.
A woman’s word shall be deemed worth nothing. As a result a woman will not be allowed to present testimony to a Sharia Law Court. Only men will be allowed to present testimony on behalf of a woman in a Sharia Law Court.
This means that in order to have the protection of the law women and girls must be accompanied by an adult man at all times. If they escape that accompaniment for any reason then if a crime is committed against them there will be no effort to punish those who committed the crime against her.
For women and girls to be afforded the protection of Sharia Law in a Sharia Law Court she must be in the company of an adult male. This adult male is preferably a relative or an employee of her family.
Five.
Women will not be allowed to operate any sort of heavy machinery or to operate any vehicle that has a motor to propel transportation.
Women will not be allowed to drive cars for example. They will be allowed to ride push bikes that do not have any form of propulsion other than the womans or girls own efforts. When riding pushbikes they must be accompanied by an adult man.
Six.
Women will not be allowed to own passports. They will be attached to the passport of their guardian.
Seven.
For all intents and purposes a woman or a girl will be considered the property of their guardian. Their guardian will be the biological father, or the oldest brother, or the oldest living male relative, or their husband. That sort of thing.
A woman or a girl who has no living male blood relative over the age of eighteen will be placed in the guardianship of a male assigned by the local imam from the local Mosque.
Eight.
In marriage the husband can terminate the marriage at any time for any reason including no reason at all. When he removes the soon to be ex wife from his home she will not be entitled to anything other than the clothes she is wearing. The soon to be ex wife will not be entitled to private property because she is not able to own any property, private or otherwise.
Those are the base eight premises for what we will introduce as Sharia Law.
I will add here a small comment on why these are the new rules we will introduce in Sharia Law by the numbering.
One.
Because when women commit the crime of slander in public they are not punished. We will solve this problem by not allowing women to speak in public at all. If a woman speaks in public and commits the crime of slander it will be her guardian that us men punish. Her guardian is then free to punish her as he sees fit.
Two.
My wife Jennifer signed our mortgage contract for our second house in February nineteen ninety two. This mortgage contract was for two hundred and twenty thousand Australian dollars if memory serves me. It was the single largest contract Jennifer ever signed.
In April nineteen ninety four Jennifer resigned her job and refused to go to work to pay her fair share of the mortgage. Her reason was, and I quote, just because I signed the mortgage contract does not mean I have to pay my fair share of the mortgage.
No women have objected to this practice of women where they sign a contract and yet do not feel that their signature on a contract is binding.
So us men will solve this problem by not accepting a womans signature on a contract at all.
Three.
Property is owned by way of contracts. So it is self explanatory that if a woman can not sign a contract she can not own property. A woman shall have access to the property that is owned by her guardian based on her guardians sole discretion.
Four.
All women have made it very clear that a womans word is worth nothing.
It does not matter if her word is written on a contract.
Or written on an affidavit signed under oath.
Or given as a solemn oath in a church in front of a minister of the church and all her family and friends in a wedding.
There is no place a woman can give her word and takes the position that she must keep it.
Even solemn oaths of until death do us part in a church before God are not considered binding to any women.
So a womans word, no matter how it is delivered, shall be considered as of no value at all.
Obviously this means a woman can not present testimony in a Sharia Law Court.
For testimony of a crime against a woman to be presented to a Sharia Law Court it must be presented by a man over the age of eighteen years.
That man will be punished if he commits perjury.
Five.
Women commonly demanded that the government cancel the driving licenses of men who do not volunteer to pay the voluntary amounts called alimony and child support.
So, under do unto others, women shall not be allowed to have driving licenses of any kind for any vehicle with any sort of powered motor. Not even an electric bike.
Further, all men know how incompetent women are at handling any vehicle or powered machine.
So women shall not be allowed to operate any heavy machinery because they are dangerous to men and they do not accept punishment for incompetent use of said machinery let alone malicious use of said heavy machinery.
Six.
Women commonly demanded that the government cancel the passports of men who do not volunteer to pay the voluntary amounts called alimony and child support.
So, under do unto others, women shall not be allowed to have a passport. She will be named as a dependent on the passport of her guardian. If her guardian wishes to take the woman to a place where a passport is needed to pass he may do so.
No person other than the woman’s guardian may transit her through any passport control point anywhere on the planet.
Seven.
Seven is self evident. The guardian of a girl or woman is to be established by blood line and age. Her guardian is to be her biological father who is the closest to her in her blood line. Then her eldest brother, eldest uncle, eldest grandfather, eldest cousin and so on.
Her guardian is to be her closest male blood relative until such time as she is “new married:.
When she takes the vow of “new marriage” her husband becomes her new guardian. For the husband to become her new guardian she must be given away to her new guardian by her current guardian.
The new guardian, the husband, retains the right to hand the woman back to her prior guardian at any time for any reason including no reason at all.
The topic of New Marriage is discussed below.
Eight.
Eight is self evident. The husband of a new marriage can divorce his wife simply by saying so and remove her from his house. He has the right to return her to her prior guardian or her new guardian in the event her prior guardian has died during the term of the new marriage.
She obviously can take no property. Her soon to be ex husband shall give her guardian such property as he sees fit and her guardian shall grant her the use of that property as he sees fit.
For example?
If a husband deems that he shall give his now ex wife some money?
Then he gives it to her guardian and her guardian grants her access to that money at his sole discretion including the ability to give her none of that money at all.
With respect to the topic of New Marriage.
Old marriage is over.
I am the inventor of New Marriage which I have called Narriage.
It can be talked of as New Marriage or Narriage.
But old marriage is dead and buried.
If you would like to learn about New Marriage you can listen to the video on the button below.
Summary.
Dear women.
Also known as man haters.
You have attacked us men for more than one hundred and fifty years now.
For some strange reason you had the very stupid idea in your heads that we would never fight back.
For the last eighteen years I have been fighting back just in the countries in which women had criminally abused me.
Now that more and more men are joining in the fight back against you I have decided to make a change to the rules of the fight back.
I am changing the rules such that for all English speaking countries, plus Germany, men are free to fight back in any way, shape or form they feel is necessary.
As of today, January the eleventh twenty twenty six I am expanding the state of war on the land of Ireland to be one of total war disregarding the Geneva Conventions on War Fare.
This is the same as I declared on the first of January twenty nineteen for the land of Australia.
Dear man haters.
You have attacked us men for more than one hundred and fifty years.
Now we are going to fight back in any way, shape or form, that we see fit.
In this war our allies are muslim men.
In this war our goal is to implement Islam as the state religion and Sharia Law as the state law.
For each country the rights of men and boys will be secured when Sharia Law is imposed.
The men of each country will decide for themselves if they agree with my proposal.
I shall work to implement my proposal in Australia and Ireland.
I shall encourage other men who live on other lands to follow my approach should they feel that it is in their best interests.
Lastly, given how miserable women are in the English Speaking World and Germany today?
It is my sincerely held belief that the lawful construct of a woman or girl being owned by her guardian for all intents and purposes will actually be beneficial to women and girls.
Independence from men has only brought women misery.
I am reminded of a comment made by the woman I would very much liked to have married in two thousand and ten.
I asked her what would make her happy.
She said to me, and I quote.
Quote.
No woman knows what makes her happy. What you need to do to a woman to make her happy is this. Her man tells her what will make her happy. He then gives her what he says will make her happy and he tells her to be happy. Then the woman will be happy. Us women are just like children in this way.
End quote.
I was very surprised by her comment and she stood by it and insisted it was true.
She said that if you allow a woman to think for herself of what would make her happy then she will only want more and more. When that more and more can not be provided she will be unhappy and make trouble for her husband.
But if she is told what she can have and told that this will make her happy?
Then she will be happy.
Now.
I want to get this post up today because it is my birthday and I want the post to go out into the public on my birthday.
So.
I will finish this open letter here
Best Regards.
Peter Andrew Nolan.
Date of birth. January the eleventh nineteen sixty four.
Post script. I put my full name and date of birth here because there was another Peter Nolan born on the same day in the same hospital as me. I do not want anyone to mistake him for me and to attack him.
I now live in Fiji. So please do not attack or cause any grief to the other Peter Nolan born in Wagga Wagga on January the eleventh nineteen sixty four.
